BEPS (Base Erosion and Profit Shifting) initiative is an OECD
Base Erosion Profit Shifting (BEPS) is a technical term indicating the tax avoidance strategies of MNCs that reduces the tax bases for countries. The terms base erosion and profit shifting are closely related
MultiNational Corporations (MNCs) avoiding Taxes
Usually, a company has to pay tax for its profit or income. This profit is the tax base for the government as tax is imposed as a percentage of this profit. Once profit is shifted to other countries or to tax havens, the tax base is eroded and there is no tax payment by the company in the concerned country.
In recent years, Multinational Corporations (MNCs) are innovating sophisticated tax planning practices to avoid taxes by shifting profits to other countries especially to tax havens. This has resulted in the erosion of tax base.
Governments hence are at the receiving end as their tax revenues are reduced.There is a growing concern with regards to the significant losses of national tax revenues because of BEPS.
In the same manner, academicians and social activists are criticizing governments for going soft on companies that are not paying taxes.
This has led to the launching of the so called BEPS project by the OECD. It has designed a fifteen point action plan to bring tackle the problem of profit shifting.
How profit shifting becomes possible?
The MNCs utilizes the loopholes or opportunities available with domestic tax laws as well as shifting income to tax havens to minimise taxes. Hence, tax avoidance is practiced by them to escape from taxes.
There are many ‘gaps and inadequacies’ of domestic laws, insufficient controlled foreign company rules, transfer mispricing, double taxation avoidance treaty abuses by MNCs to avoid taxes.
What is the BASE EROSION AND PROFIT SHIFTING (BEPS) project?
The BEPS (Base Erosion and Profit Shifting) initiative is an Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) effort, approved by the G20, to design a globally standardized rules to check tax avoidance practices by the MNCs so that there will be no tax base erosion.
OECD has set the December 2015 target to finally bring out the new standard rules that need international cooperation to check base erosion and profit shifting.
As a part of the BEPS project, OECD has developed an action plan at the request of the G20 to counter the tax avoidance practice by corporate.
The Action Plan includes fifteen detailed actions that governments can take to reduce the tax avoidance by MNCs. The Action Plan is scheduled to be completed in three phases: September 2014, September 2015, and December 2015.
Some of the actions will require coordination and information sharing between governments, and potentially the amendment of existing tax treaties.
About BASE EROSION AND PROFIT SHIFTING (BEPS) Project
- The BEPS Project delivered its 15 final outputs in October 2015, two years after its launch in 2013, representing the most fundamental changes to international tax rules in a century.
- The overall aim of the BEPS measures is to close gaps in international tax rules that allow multinational enterprises to legally but artificially shift profits to low or no-tax jurisdictions.
- OECD and G20 countries developed the measures on an equal footing, with extensive engagement by developing countries and regional tax organisations.
- The focus now shifts to designing an inclusive framework for monitoring and supporting implementation, with all interested countries and jurisdictions invited to participate on an equal footing.
Why is this important?
Revenue losses from BEPS are conservatively estimated at between USD 100 billion and 240 billion annually. This is equivalent to between 4% and 10% of global revenues from corporate income tax.
Given developing countries’ greater reliance on such revenues, estimates of the impact on these countries, as a percentage of GDP, is even higher.
BEPS affects everyone. It harms governments because it reduces their tax revenues and raises the cost of ensuring compliance.
It harms people because, when some MNEs pay low or no tax, individual taxpayers must shoulder a greater share of the tax burden. And finally it harms businesses themselves:
MNEs face significant reputational risk from the public focus on their tax affairs while domestic companies face an uneven playing field when competing with multinationals. BEPS undermines the tax system’s integrity and the trust of citizens.
The goal of the BEPS Project is therefore to restore trust and ensure fair competition among all actors, while maintaining the ability to eliminate double taxation.
What is the impact?
Even before implementation gets fully underway, the BEPS measures are having an impact. Some large MNEs have announced important changes to their tax structuring, indicating that taxpayers are already changing their behaviour.
Once implemented, the measures will improve the coherence of tax rules across borders, tighten substance requirements and ensure increased transparency and certainty.
Improving coherence: Model rules have been developed and best practices identified to ensure that the design of domestic measures takes into account what happens beyond borders.
- Model rules are available to eliminate Hybrid Mismatch Arrangements that allow income to go untaxed by exploiting differences in domestic tax laws;
- The building blocks for effective Controlled Foreign Corporation (CFC) rules have been identified;
- Common approach has been developed in the area of interest deductibility;
- Best practices have been established for mandatory disclosure regimes.
Finally, the work ensures that both companies and governments will play fair, eliminating or modifying preferential regimes that are potentially harmful, and that there will be exchange information on certain rulings.
Tightening substance: Transfer pricing rules have been upgraded to ensure that outcomes are driven by economic reality. Recognising the difficulty in valuing intellectual property, an approach to pricing hard-to-value intangibles, such as patents and trademarks, has been designed. Simplification mechanisms have been developed for commodity transactions and low value-adding services, two areas of particular relevance for developing countries.
In the area of treaty abuse, a minimum standard has been agreed to ensure that treaty benefits are only granted to those that deserve them. Finally, the definition of “permanent establishment” (which sets the threshold for taxation of non-residents) has been modified to better reflect business realities and avoid widespread circumvention.
Ensuring more transparency and certainty: Indicators of the scale and economic impact of BEPS have been developed. This ensures that tools are available to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness and impact of the actions taken to address BEPS. Recommendations have been formulated on the design of mandatory disclosure rules.
The requirements for transfer pricing documentation have been substantially revised, with a groundbreaking template agreed for country-by-country reporting of indicators of economic activity. Countries have also agreed to exchange information on a wide range of rulings. Effective dispute resolution mechanisms have been reinforced, including the use of arbitration for interested countries.
Minimum standards have been agreed to level the playing field in four areas, namely treaty shopping, country-by-country reporting, dispute resolution and harmful tax practices. These are areas where countries have committed to consistent implementation to tackle cases where no action by some countries would have created negative spillovers (including adverse impacts of competitiveness) on other countries.
The BEPS implementation phase will be characterised by a structured and inclusive framework that places all interested countries and jurisdictions on an equal footing. The framework will support and monitor implementation of the different measures and examine their impact over time.
The package of BEPS measures aims to improve the coherence of international tax rules, reinforce their focus on economic substance and ensure a more transparent tax environment. Policymakers should swiftly implement these measures to provide a more certain and sustainable international tax environment.
While a number of measures may be directly applicable, like the revised guidance on transfer pricing, a number of measures designed by governments require implementation by national lawmakers. The work to develop a multilateral instrument to implement the treaty-related BEPS measures into the existing network of bilateral tax treaties has already started, with around 90 jurisdictions participating. The instrument will be open for signature in 2016.
Toolkits are also being developed to provide practical solutions and address specific issues faced by developing countries. Follow-up technical work will cover profit attribution rules and provide more detailed guidance on the application of profit-split methods and the application of the group-wide ratio for purposes of interest deductibility rules.